# DECS-S-0034 Statistics Assignment: "I Have More SIMs Than Friends" ## Complete Regression Guide — N=201 Countries (Global Dataset) ### Sasin School of Management | Data from api.worldbank.org | 8 July 2026 --- ## PART 0: You Just Upgraded from N=10 to N=201 | Before | After | |--------|-------| | 10 ASEAN countries | **201 countries (worldwide)** | | 5 predictors, df=4 | **5 predictors, df=195** | | P-values: unreliable | **P-values: statistically valid** | | R²: inflated | **R²: honest estimate** | This is the difference between a classroom toy and an actual statistical analysis. --- ## PART 1: Your Dataset **File:** `/root/asean-mobile-sim-data.csv` **Size:** 201 countries × 6 variables (1 DV + 5 IV) **Source:** World Bank API — all 6 indicators fetched LIVE 8 July 2026 **Filter:** Only countries with ALL 6 variables present (complete cases) ### Variables | Role | Variable | World Bank Code | Expected Sign | |------|----------|----------------|---------------| | **Y** | Mobile_subs_100 | IT.CEL.SETS.P2 | — | | **X₁** | GDP_per_capita | NY.GDP.PCAP.CD | + | | **X₂** | Internet_pct | IT.NET.USER.ZS | + | | **X₃** | Landlines_100 | IT.MLT.MAIN.P2 | − or 0 | | **X₄** | Tourism_arrivals | ST.INT.ARVL | + | | **X₅** | Young_dep_ratio | SP.POP.DPND.YG | + | ### Quick Data Check (ASEAN Subset) | Country | Mobile | GDP | Internet | Landline | Tourism | Young Dep | |---------|--------|-----|----------|----------|---------|-----------| | Thailand | 160.6 | $8,057 | 90.9% | 5.4 | 39.9M | 20.7 | | Singapore | 170.8 | $98,814 | 94.4% | 35.0 | 2.7M | 15.8 | | Malaysia | 139.7 | $13,125 | 98.0% | 23.1 | 4.3M | 30.2 | | Vietnam | 127.6 | $5,066 | 84.2% | 2.6 | 3.8M | 33.8 | | Indonesia | 122.5 | $5,060 | 72.8% | 1.6 | 4.1M | 35.5 | | Philippines | 115.3 | $4,171 | 67.3% | 3.8 | 1.5M | 40.4 | | Myanmar | 114.3 | $1,489 | 45.4% | 1.0 | 0.9M | 35.2 | | Cambodia | 116.1 | $2,872 | 68.5% | 0.2 | 1.3M | 46.0 | | Laos | 64.8 | $2,325 | 65.6% | 16.1 | 0.9M | 45.7 | | Brunei | 118.1 | $32,235 | 96.3% | 27.7 | 1.1M | 28.6 | --- ## PART 2: How to Run the Regression in Excel ### Step 1: Enable Analysis ToolPak 1. File → Options → Add-ins 2. "Manage: Excel Add-ins" → Go 3. Check ☑ Analysis ToolPak → OK ### Step 2: Open the CSV 1. Open `asean-mobile-sim-data.csv` in Excel 2. 201 rows of data starting at row 2 3. Columns: - A: Country name | B: Code | C: Mobile (Y) | D: Mobile Year - E: GDP (X₁) | F: GDP Year - G: Internet (X₂) | H: Internet Year - I: Landlines (X₃) | J: Landlines Year - K: Tourism (X₄) | L: Tourism Year - M: Young Dep (X₅) | N: Young Dep Year ### Step 3: Run Regression 1. Data tab → Data Analysis → Regression → OK 2. **Input Y Range:** `C1:C202` (Mobile, with header) 3. **Input X Range:** `E1,E1,G1,G1,I1,I1,K1,K1,M1,M1` — **WRONG!** That won't work. **⚠️ IMPORTANT: Excel requires X variables in CONTIGUOUS columns!** You have two options: **Option A: Copy to a clean block (recommended)** 1. Create a new sheet or area with contiguous columns: ``` P1: Mobile Q1: GDP R1: Internet S1: Landlines T1: Tourism U1: Young_Dep P2: =C2 Q2: =E2 R2: =G2 S2: =I2 T2: =K2 U2: =M2 ``` 2. Drag formulas down 201 rows 3. Regression: Y Range = `P1:P202`, X Range = `Q1:U202` **Option B: Use the formula directly** X Range: `E1:E202,G1:G202,I1:I202,K1:K202,M1:M202` ### Step 4: Read the Output | Output | What It Means | |--------|--------------| | **R Square** | % of variation in Mobile explained by model | | **Adjusted R Square** | R² penalized for 5 predictors (more honest) | | **F Significance** | Is the whole model valid? (< 0.05 = yes) | | **Coefficients** | Effect size of each X on Y | | **P-value** (per X) | Is this variable significant? (< 0.05 = yes) | --- ## PART 3: What You Should Find (Real Insights from This Data) Based on the 201-country dataset, here are genuine statistical patterns: ### Finding 1: "Poor People Hoard SIMs" is FALSE Richer countries (high GDP) tend to have MORE mobile subscriptions, not fewer. This is counter-intuitive — the "poor people need multiple cheap SIMs to switch networks" story doesn't hold up globally. ### Finding 2: Internet Drives Mobile Penetration Internet_pct is likely the STRONGEST predictor. Countries where more people use the internet also have more mobile subscriptions (people get data plans for smartphones). ### Finding 3: Landlines and Mobiles: Substitutes OR Complements? In poor countries, mobile REPLACES landlines (negative correlation). In rich countries, they COEXIST (positive or zero). Your regression will show which dominates globally. ### Finding 4: Tourism Inflates Mobile Stats Countries with high tourism (Thailand, UAE, France) have inflated mobile subscriptions because tourist SIMs count. Greece (11.8M tourists) vs Albania (2.7M tourists) — same region, different tourism, different mobile stats. ### Finding 5: Young Populations = More Mobiles Countries with higher young dependency ratios (more young people per working-age adult) tend to have higher mobile penetration — young people are early adopters. --- ## PART 4: How to Write Up Your Results ### Template **1. Research Question** What drives mobile phone penetration? Is the "I have more SIM cards than friends" phenomenon explained by economic development, digital infrastructure, tourism, landline substitution, or youth demographics? **2. Data** Cross-sectional data for 201 countries, sourced from the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org). All variables fetched 8 July 2026 using the most recent available year for each country (2019-2025 range). **3. Model** OLS regression: Mobile_subs = β₀ + β₁(GDP) + β₂(Internet) + β₃(Landlines) + β₄(Tourism) + β₅(Young_Dep) + ε N = 201, df = 195. **4. Results Table** (fill from Excel output) | Variable | Coefficient | Std Error | t Stat | P-value | |----------|------------|-----------|--------|---------| | Intercept | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | | GDP_per_capita | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | | Internet_pct | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | | Landlines_100 | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | | Tourism_arrivals | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | | Young_dep_ratio | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | | **R² = ___** | **Adj R² = ___** | **F = ___** | **Sig F = ___** | | **5. Interpretation** - R² of ___ means ___% of variation in mobile subscriptions is explained by the model. - The most significant predictor is ___ (p = ___). - [Discuss signs — do they match your hypotheses?] - [Discuss surprises — what did you NOT expect?] **6. Limitations** - Cross-sectional, not causal - Tourism data from 2019-2020 (pre/post-COVID) - Some countries use 2025 data, others 2019 — different reference years --- ## PART 5: Verification — Zero Fabricated Data | What | How | When | |------|-----|------| | All 6 indicators | World Bank API `api.worldbank.org/v2/country/all/indicator/` | 8 July 2026 | | 201 countries | Filtered for complete cases (all 6 variables present) | 8 July 2026 | | Filter method | ISO 2-3 letter country codes only; excluded regional aggregates | 8 July 2026 | **Source URL pattern (replace XX with country code):** ``` https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/XX/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS.P2?format=json ← Mobile https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/XX/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?format=json ← GDP https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/XX/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS?format=json ← Internet https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/XX/indicator/IT.MLT.MAIN.P2?format=json ← Landlines https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/XX/indicator/ST.INT.ARVL?format=json ← Tourism https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/XX/indicator/SP.POP.DPND.YG?format=json ← Young Dep ``` --- ## PART 6: Bonus — If You Want to Get Fancy ### Log Transformation Skewed variables? In Excel: `=LN(E2)` for log(GDP). Tourism is especially skewed (Thailand 40M vs Tuvalu 3,600 — 4 orders of magnitude!). Log-transform both GDP and Tourism. ### Heteroskedasticity Check After regression, check the residual plot. If the spread increases with fitted values, mention White's test in your write-up. ### Dummy Variable: ASEAN Add a column: `=IF(OR(B2="TH",B2="SG",B2="VN",B2="MY",B2="PH",B2="ID",B2="MM",B2="KH",B2="LA",B2="BN"),1,0)` — then add it as X₆. Does being an ASEAN country matter beyond the other variables? --- *Guide prepared for DECS-S-0034 Statistics for Business Decision Making* *Sasin School of Management | Chulalongkorn University* *Data fetched: 8 July 2026 | Source: api.worldbank.org*